A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF VIETNAM'S PRIVATE EDUCATION SECTOR FOR DEVELOPING A STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR PRIVATE UNIVERSITY ADVANCEMENT.
Keywords:
Strategic framework, private universities, Vietnam, private education, institutional advancement, competitivenessAbstract
This research looked at how strategy structures affected the expansion of private universities in Vietnam and the part played by the private educational industry in this process. The need for advanced degrees and skilled workers in Vietnam has contributed to a dramatic expansion of private colleges in recent years. Using descriptive statistics, odds ratios, and analysis of variance, the study used a quantitative method to examine the association between private education and university progression. The data was gathered from 633 legitimate replies to a standardised questionnaire that was circulated using simple random sampling. The results showed that private institutions with clear strategies were more successful in attracting students, producing better graduates, and fostering organisational growth. The distribution of resources, the quality of instruction, and the scope of investigations at those educational institutions were all noticeably better. This study analysed the role of the private education sector and the impact of strategic frameworks on the growth of private universities in Vietnam. Vietnam has seen a sharp rise in the number of private universities in the past few decades, driven by its demand for highly educated professionals. The investigation assessed the correlation between private schooling and subsequent university enrolment utilising statistical methods such as analysis of variance, odds ratios, and descriptive statistics. The information originated from 633 valid responses to a structured survey that was made available via simple random selection. Recruiting pupils, increasing the quality of graduates, and encouraging organisational development were all areas in which colleges and universities that had well-defined plans performed better. Notably greater included the allocation of funds, the standards of teaching, and the breadth of research at these universities.